All of the entries in the Heritage Collection are from generation I, while a good listing of SCPs would contain listings from all three generations.
The SCP listing is meant in part to illustrate the wide variety of SCPs on the website. Also, I'm hesitant to limit entries on the list solely to the Heritage Collection. There are only a small number of SCPs that have gotten enough coverage to get an entry, so I'm not too worried about the lists size so long as we make sure to regularly prune entries that have not gotten coverage in reliable sources. Wuzh ( talk) 02:12, (UTC) I added a hidden message asking that any contributions be sourced to a reliable source independent of the SCP Foundation, and stating that any entry that fails this requirement may be removed. And even then, we shouldn't add all of them, just the 'most' most notable ones. I am suggesting that we should reduce it to just the most notable ones, and by that I mean the ones on the Heritage Collection. I am a bit worried that people will just add more and more examples to that section and cause its size to completely go out of hand.
